Op-Ed: With the individual mandate dead, the rest of Obamacare is unconstitutional


(Worthy News) – In 2012, Chief Justice John Roberts famously ruled the Affordable Care Act’s provision mandating most people purchase health insurance or else pay a fine constitutional on the basis that Congress has the authority to tax individuals, and the so-called Obamacare “fine” is effectively a tax.

As the now-deceased Justice Antonin Scalia pointed out in his dissenting opinion, in classifying the Obamacare penalty as a “tax,” Roberts ignored history, the language of the healthcare law, statements made by the Obama administration and Democrats in Congress, and common sense. (The obvious difference between a fine and a tax is that the purpose of a tax is to raise revenue, not to force people to behave in a particular way.)

Interestingly, however faulty Roberts’ decision may have been, it now serves as the foundation for a legal argument that could eventually lead to Obamacare’s demise. [ Source (Read More…) ]

10
people are currently praying.

💡 Did you know? One of the best ways you can support Worthy News is by simply leaving a comment and sharing this article.

📢 Social media algorithms push content further when there’s more engagement — so every 👍 like, 💬 comment, and 🔄 share helps more people discover the truth. 🙌

Latest Worthy News

Bear Attack On Schoolchildren Shocks Remote Canadian Community
German Chancellor Joins Call On U.S.-Russian Ukraine Plan As Deadly Strikes Hit Zaporizhzhia
Fire Disrupts COP30 As Infrastructure Concerns Mount In Brazil
Bangladesh Quake Kills At Least Eight, Injures Hundreds
Boiler Blast At Pakistan Factory Kills At Least 18, Sparks Safety Concerns
Scores of Students Abducted From Catholic School in Nigeria as Christian Attacks Surge
IDF Reveals Tunnel That Held Lt. Hadar Goldin: “One of the Most Significant Ever Found”
Federal Judge Orders Halt To National Guard Deployment In DC
Democrats Urge Troops To ‘Refuse Illegal Orders’ As DOJ Warns Of Risks
Fair Use Notice:This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Worthy Christian News