Belarusian Government To Make U-Turn On Charismatic Church That Meets In A Former Cowshed?
Hunger Strike By New Life Church Has Caught Belarusian President’s Attention
By Michael Ireland
Special Correspondent, ASSIST News Service
MINSK, BELARUS (ANS) — Belarusian authorities may be preparing to reverse their position towards New Life Church in the capital Minsk, members of which have been on a hunger strike in order to resist efforts by the government to close them down.
A senior state official has stated that President Aleksandr Lukashenko was aware of New Life’s situation, regarding them as “a normal church in need of assistance.”
According to an article by Geraldine Fagan, writing for Forum 18 News Service (www.forum18.org), the official then made a “strong recommendation” to New Life’s Pastor, Vyacheslav Goncharenko, that the church try another appeal to the Higher Economic Court.
Fagan states that New Life has now done this, but the church’s lawyer, Sergei Lukanin, stressed to Forum 18 that the congregation will continue public protests until it has the legal return of its land and building and the right to worship there. Previous state promises to resolve the situation have been broken.
The Declaration of the fasting hunger-strikers in support of New Life Church’s demands was read at the open air protest meeting at Bangalor Square, Minsk.
New Life’s high-profile public protests over the past fortnight — including hunger strikes throughout Belarus, daily services, and international support — appear to be responsible for the president’s sudden attention. New Life has been fined for meeting, as have other churches in Belarus — such as a Baptist church in Minsk, which was fined this month.
Speaking from Minsk on October 18, however, lawyer and church member Sergei Lukanin stressed that the 1000-strong congregation intends to continue various forms of public protest until its demands — the legal return of its land and building and the right to worship there — are met.
Fagan writes: “A possible change of heart by the government became apparent on October 17, when New Life’s Pastor Vyacheslav Goncharenko was invited to see Oleg Proleskovsky, head of the Main Ideological Department within the Presidential Administration.”
During the 15-minute meeting, Lukanin told Forum 18, the senior state official maintained that President Aleksandr Lukashenko was aware of New Life’s situation, regarding them as “a normal church in need of assistance,” Fagan says
Explaining that a solution was not possible outside the court system, however, Proleskovsky then reportedly suggested that New Life turn to Belarus’ Higher Economic Court. When Pastor Goncharenko replied that the Court had already rejected the church’s appeals, continued Lukanin, Proleskovsky repeated his “strong recommendation” that it try again.
On October 18, said Lukanin, New Life therefore formally asked the Higher Economic Court to overturn Minsk City Executive Committee’s August 17, 2005 decision curtailing the church’s land rights and ordering the forced sale of its building.
Fagan writes: “The church’s intention to continue its protest, despite the meeting with Oleg Proleskovsky, is due to an earlier unfulfilled promise by a senior government representative. In September 2005 the congregation called off plans to march to the office of the Mayor of Minsk after Belarus’ Deputy Interior Minister similarly gave ‘his word as an officer’ that he would help resolve the church’s predicament. This did not happen, however (see F18News 22 September 2005 www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=656).”
Contacted on October 19, a spokesperson at President Lukashenko’s Press Service was unfamiliar with the issue and directed Forum 18 to Oleg Proleskovsky of the Main Ideological Department’s secretary. Explaining that Proleskovsky was absent, the secretary said that she did not have any documentation referring to the October 17 meeting Forum 18 described.
Asked whether Proleskovsky could be contacted either by Forum 18 or herself, the secretary said not, and that it would be better to speak to the Presidential Administration official who would have organised the meeting. Her telephone went unanswered on October 20, however.
Fagan says: “New Life has previously written to President Lukashenko, most recently sending an open letter with a 2500-signature petition on August 7, 2006. A September 23 response came not from the president’s office, however, but from Minsk City Executive Committee, which claimed that it had repeatedly offered solutions to the church’s property problems. New Life rejects this claim.”
Fagan continues: “New Life’s high-profile public protests over the past fortnight thus appear to be responsible for the president’s sudden attention. On October 5 the church began an indefinite fast/hunger-strike, which at the time of writing has 156 participants in 16 locations throughout Belarus. A core of approximately 30 hunger-strikers are protesting within the church’s threatened building, whose inner walls display banners with the congregation’s demands to Minsk City Executive Committee and a Belarusian-language slogan: ‘Stop discrimination against evangelical Christians in Belarus!’ At a press conference on October 6, Pastor Goncharenko declared, ‘if the authorities continue to ignore our demands and start acting aggressively, then we reserve the right to unsanctioned public action.'”
The church is also holding services at its building every evening, attended on October 8 by pastors from 19 other Belarusian Protestant churches, Fagan notes.
Cited on New Life’s website, one of the pastors explained his participation thus: “I believe that this protest against the arbitrariness of the authorities should be the principal activity of all those seeking truth and justice in our country.” By October 10, New Life was reporting receipt of letters of support from America, Cyprus, Finland, Germany, Nigeria, Russia, South Africa, Uganda, Ukraine and the UK, including from several Protestant bishops. On October 12 and 13 representatives of the US Embassy, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) and the wife of imprisoned presidential opposition candidate Aleksandr Kozulin visited the church. On October 16, Minsk City Executive Committee granted official permission for New Life to hold a demonstration with up to 700 participants on Bangalore Square — a major junction 4 km [2 ½ miles] north-east of Minsk city centre — at 6 pm on Saturday, October 21.
“According to New Life, state medical personnel refused to monitor the condition of the hunger strikers in the church’s building after their first visit on October 12. On that day one participant was admitted to a local hospital but discharged on October 13 after taking doctors’ advice to break his fast. On October 17 the church reported that a doctor working for the main Baptist Union’s medical program and other Christian medics were now monitoring the hunger strikers,” Fagan reports.
Fagan says that so far the Minsk authorities have made no move to seize the church, despite believing that they are legally entitled to do so (see F18News 6 October 2006 www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=851.
Fagan explains: “On October 11 a local official informed New Life that its building has now been transferred onto the balance of Minsk’s Moscow District, and asked a church representative to sign papers confirming the forced sale. Believing the state’s action to be unlawful, New Life is refusing to comply. Also on October 11, the church reported the first of two threatening incidents. At approximately 9am, a truck, a bulldozer, two cars and three minibuses with tinted windows approached the church’s building. New Life’s website cited the driver of one of the cars as saying that Minsk City Executive Committee had sent them ‘to level something here’ and that they were awaiting further instructions. The vehicles reportedly moved away from the church’s building some time later, however.”
In the second incident, New Life reported the presence of two senior police officers and four people in plain clothes watching the church’s building on the evening of October 17.
Fagan gos on to say that in comments published by the Russian news agency Interfax on October 12, the vice-chairman of Minsk City Executive Committee and the city’s top religious affairs official accused New Life of violating laws on religious activity and demonstrations. The former official, Mikhail Titenkov, stressed that “Minsk City Executive Committee does not intend to give permission to turn the building of the disused cowshed — a fire hazard, moreover — into a house of worship.”
As she has previously maintained to Forum 18 (see F18News 21 February 2005 www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=516), the latter official, Alla Ryabitseva, insisted that New Life had purchased the disused cowshed and associated plot of land without the right to alter its designated usage: “It is not intended for religious events.” She also claimed that the church’s request to reconstruct the building had been denied because statutes of religious organizations did not provide for social or cultural work under the 2002 Religion Law, and that the church’s heating system and electricity generator “pose extreme danger to its parishioners.”
New Life denies these claims. In an October 13 statement on the Interfax feature, the church points out that Paragraph Four of the state-registered sale contract for its building notes the aim of acquisition to be reconstruction of the building as a house of worship, while the church’s land-use contract stipulates that construction will take place with the agreement of the state authorities. In 2003 and 2004 Minsk’s architecture officials twice granted such permission, New Life continues, but this was rescinded “in view of the written opinion of the Department for Religious and Ethnic Affairs” — which is headed by Alla Ryabitseva. The church also insists that its building — housing a high-quality heating system rather than a stove — is in full compliance with relevant safety standards.
Photographs of the hunger strike — clearly showing the condition of the church’s building — may be viewed at .
Arguing that New Life’s building is technically a cowshed, Minsk officials have refused to grant the 1000-strong congregation permission to use it for services. The state authorities simultaneously refuse to allow the church to legalise its position by changing the building’s designation to that of a house of worship. Minsk’s top religious affairs official — Alla Ryabitseva — has claimed to Forum 18 that this is impossible due to the city Development Plan (see F18News 21 February 2005 www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=516.
However, an official in charge of executing the Development Plan recently told a Minsk court that it was technically possible to site a house of worship for New Life “anywhere in the city,” but that this depended upon permission from the religious affairs department (see F18News 28 July 2006 www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=819).
New Life has been worshipping at its disused cowshed ever since being barred from renting a local house of culture in September 2004. As church administrator Vasili Yurevich told public prosecution officials in December 2004, the congregation was earlier refused requests to rent other public facilities by district administrations throughout Minsk (see F18News 16 December 2004 www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=477). The church’s continued use of its building for services has resulted in
multiple large fines (see most recently F18News 17 August 2006 www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=83), in addition to the authorities’ decision to confiscate the building.
Other churches in Minsk have also been fined for meeting. For example, this month a Baptist, Andrei Piskun, was prosecuted by an administrative commission in Minsk’s Soviet District for organizing and holding a religious meeting without registering its statutes (an offence under Article 193 of the Administrative Violations Code) on Sunday August 13. Piskun was fined 15,550 Belarusian Roubles [48 Norwegian Kroner, 6 Euros, or 7 US Dollars] on 4 October, according to the Baptist Council of Churches, who refuse on principle to register with the authorities in post-Soviet countries.
In a statement to Judge Vladimir Chvala, Piskun writes of his disagreement with the verdict, arguing the accusation that he organized a church to be unfounded, “as services in the church have been taking place since 1963.” He also cites guarantees of freedom of expression, religion and association in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Belarusian Constitution.
For more background information see Forum 18’s Belarus religious freedom survey at www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=478.
A survey of the religious freedom decline in the eastern part of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) area is at www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=806.
A printer-friendly map of Belarus is available at www.nationalgeographic.com/xpeditions/atlas/index.html?Parent=europe&Rootmap=belaru
© Forum 18 News Service. All rights reserved. ISSN 1504-2855. You may reproduce or quote this article provided that credit is given to F18News www.forum18.org/
Past and current Forum 18 information can be found at www.forum18.org/
If you need to contact F18News, please email them at: f18news@editor.forum18.org
Forum 18
Postboks 6603
Rodeløkka
N-0502 Oslo
NORWAY